Friday, January 16, 2009

SLUMDOG MILLIONAIRES AND CELLULOID ECONOMICS

I finally went ahead and did what many P3Ps would have done it on the sly but what the venerable Shobhaa De confessed to in the very public columns of a national daily.

 

I watched a pirated copy of Slumdog Millionaire. A few days before it rained Golden Globes. Some days before it gets officially released in India and possibly rakes in record-breaking collections.

 

Except for giving a fleeting sense of achievement on joining Shobhaa De in the ‘me too’ caucus, the film did little to excite.  Not that the film was bad in any way. Far from it. It was a perfectly entertaining film. And like any well-crafted work of cinematic art, it has its moments of sublime charm, its share of gut-wrenching scenes and its share of searing dialogues. But all these don’t really come together to make a truly memorable film. Nor are the performances of the lead actors in the danger of being reckoned as landmarks in the histrionic history of any wood, Holly, Bolly or even Lolly.

 

Let’s take our over-hyped re-invention artiste, Anil Kapoor. Donning the role of a TV show host so majestically essayed by Amitabh Bachchan in real life (KBC), Kapoor robs the character of every iota of dignity. Nobody may grudge an ageing actor his prejudices about the awareness quotient of a Chaiwala, but not even a national icon can get away with uncouth snobbery on a TV show. The repeated berating of Jamal as a teaboy and constant references to his lowly status by Prem, the host of the TV show, may have been scripted to highlight the chinks in Prem’s character, a man who enjoys the blind adulation of millions of Indians. But it only succeeds in adding unnecessary melodrama. And in an insane moment, Kapoor also lurches into a ludicrous jig, looking like an uninvited baraati in Chandni Chowk. Long after it’s gone off the air, what one remembers of KBC is not the names of the winners nor the questions but the amazing grace and humility with which Amitabh dealt with all the participants, their families and friends. Or is it somebody’s case that Prem’s character was modelled after the altogether different host of KBC2?  

 

Traversing a period of over a decade, the structure of the film does not lend itself to sustained linear progression. As a result, all actors end up doing what could be termed ‘significant cameos’, even as little Jamal sparkles in his role. AR Rahman could have got the Golden Globe and the Oscar for many of his film scores, but Slumdog Millionaire is certainly not one among them. His compositions for the film maybe classified as experimentation due to habit. The last song of the film, quite clearly an afterthought in due deference to the diktats of the Indian box-office remains just that. An afterthought.

 

So why’s there so much hoopla about the film? I’d hate to be a cynic but this smells like the Miss World/Universe days all over again. Remember the 1990s when the world suddenly woke up to the beauty quotient of India and we had a rash of beauty queens carrying the burden from Asia-Pacific to the Atlantic? In fact, it seemed as if all that was required to be crowned Miss World/Universe/Galaxy was to look adequately like a woman and wear a sash that said ‘India’. It was not much later that we learnt about the cosmetics industry’s not very altruistic role in placing India firmly on the beauty map of the world. The accolades for Slumdog Millionaire appear to be similarly market-driven. A tribute neither to the artistry nor to the artistes of the film but to the imperatives of the emerging global economic situation.

 

Now, that’d be a real pity!

Thursday, January 15, 2009

The Terror of Truth

Thanks to AA Kasab and his band of deadly brothers, my nine-year old today boasts of vastly enhanced cognitive skills. Like she can tell a terrorist, when she sees one. Or so I thought. But last night, as she traversed the many channels on the TV between Pogo and Disney ,she seemed to linger for just that small fraction of a second. I then heard her mutter 'terrorist' as she rapidly punched the TV remote and moved on to Hannah Montana.I turned from my book with a start. Did she say 'terrorist'? I didn't remember hearing anything about a terrorist in the last newscast.

What was she watching, my little girl? 

They just showed the picture of a terrorist, she said. 

Where? 

In the news.

Right, flip back and let's see that again.

Another rapid punching of the remote took us to one of the 'your own' channels, breathlessly breaking news as usual.

There, that's the guy, she said, pointing at the beatific face being beamed on the TV. A face radiating gentle grace, troubled only by a pair of doleful eyes full of hurt innocence. I was horrified. That's no terrorist, honey, that's Mr Ramalinga Raju, the boss of Satyam. Well, OK, the former CEO of Satyam. 

Terrorist, my little girl said. 

If you say so,but why do you think he's a terrorist? 

Coz he's on all the news channels, dummy. 

But honey, Mr Ramalinga Raju's no terrorist. He's just a businessman fallen on bad times.

Terrorist,she reiterated with a finality that brooked no further argument and flipped back to Hannah Montana.

That got me wondering.

The papers said Kasab and company accounted for 183 lives and a loss of approximately Rs 4000 crores to the economy. Mr Raju, on the the other hand, stacks up with 53000 lives and Rs 7000 crores.And still counting. Kasab had no kinship with the people he killed, no prior acquaintance of the lives he destroyed. For the 53000 employees and possibly a couple of lakhs more people making up the families of the Satyam employees, Mr Raju was God. The lives that Mr Raju set about destroying are of those that feted him, saluted him, loved him, worshipped him. 

If terrorism is what terrorism does, then surely the fear that Mr Raju has engendered in thousands of Satyam employees and thousands more in the IT and ancillary industries and millions more in India and abroad qualifies to be termed as terrorism. 

But, whereas Kasab and his dead mates failed to get any lawyer even to make a token representation, news reports say many powerful people are vying to protect Mr Raju. My friends took to the streets denouncing Kasab and lighting candles. Same friends are posting facebook notes mourning the bad turn of events for a good man.

I write of Kasab, plain Kasab, with no appellations and no qualms. I am careful not to miss out the Mister in Mr Raju.    

I am terrified, to tell you the truth!